mineral-nutrition.com

Labeling a beverage “milk” has devolved into an acrimonious discussion between the dairy industry, consumers and the Food and Drug Administration. Despite demonstrating that consumers respond positively to the health and nutrients of both plant- and dairy-based choices, and that the diffemagnesium glycinate dan zincrent beverages are not confusing, commentary on the study seems to imply consumer sentiment that perhaps the term “milk” should be exclusively reserved for dairy.Making the argument that plant-based beverages shouldmolybdenum citrate not be able to use the term, the dairy industry has appealed to Congress and the FDzinc supplement pureA, gone to court and pushed for federal legislation calling on FDA to enforce its legal definition of milk. FDA Commnatural vitality magnesium glycinateissioner Scott Gottlieb said last spring that the agency might soonbenefits of malic acid and magnesium restrict makers of plant-based beverages from using the word “milk” on product labeling and issue new guidance on the standards of identity for products that can use traditional dairy industry terminology.As the debate rages on, the dairy industry has claimed that plant-based product labeling confuses customers when the products aren’t nutritionally equivalent to dairy milk. However, a recent online survey from the International Food Information Council found about three-quarters of consumers know that plant-based milk doesn’t contain cow’s milk.Perhaps instead of insisting that the word “milk” is removed from plant-based dairy beverage, the two sides could compromise and each label their respective packaging with an adjective that defines the beverage’s source. After all, although both dairy products, cow milk differs from goat milk just like almond milk differs from pea milk.Even if the dairy industry is unwilling to compromise, it’s not likely that simply changing the terminology from “milk” to something like “plant-based beverage” is going to make much difference. Consumers are likely going to continue using the word because it is simple English vernacular to describe an opaque liquid rich in protein. Changing the word is not likely to alter shopping habits. However, creating dissonance between spoken and written terminology may damage the branding that these plant-based alternatives have worked to cultivate.