Sugar concerns spur alternative sweetener development
With sugar in the headlines for all the wrong reasons, manufacturers are seeking alternatives — but many consumers also view artificial
sweeteners with suspicion. Natural sources of sweetness, such as honey and agave, are other choices. These are also high calorie optionskp ferrous gluconate that can lead to obesity in the same way ascan you take vitamin d and magnesium glyc
inate together sugaferric pyrophosphate syrupr. By July 2018, manufacturers will have to include “added sugars” on the Nutrition Facts panel, providing added motivation to cut sweeteners like sugar, honey, fructose and fruit juice concentrates. Solutions like Tate & Lyle’s blend of allulose, sucralose and fructose may come into their own, allowing food companies to find a compromise with a smaller amount of added sugars, and added sweetness from low- and zero-calorie sweeteners.It remains to be seen whether consumers will be willing to make trade-offs. Will they continue to consume added sugars in the same way, or will the new nutritional information labels lead some consumers to avoid certain products. Whferrous gluconate dihydrateat is clear is that many manufacturers and ingredient suppliers are preparing for change. But when it comes to sweeteners, change comes at a cost.Despite rapid growth in the naturally derived sweeteners market
, stevia and monk fruit still account for a small proportion of total sweetener use. They are limited by price, as they are still more expensive than synthetically produced high intensity sweeteners, as well as ong
oing problems with aftertaste. Blends of sugar and stevia have become incrferrous fumarate half lifeeasingly popular, particularly within the beverage industry. In Europe, the Coca-Cola Company has even reformulated its regular Sprite with 30% less sugar and added stevia, without positioning it as a mid-calorie option.
Leave a Reply